Measuring responsible AI in 136 countries
Measuring responsible AI in 136 countries
Measuring responsible AI in 136 countries
Measuring responsible AI in 136 countries

Australia

Australia

Analyze and compare the Global Index scores for Australia

Analyze and compare the Global Index scores for Australia

Analyze and compare the Global Index scores for Australia

Explore how Australia measures up against other countries

Explore how Australia measures up against other countries

Explore how Australia measures up against other countries

Explore how Australia measures up against other countries

Government frameworks

Government frameworks

31st

/

138

Australia got a score of 34.69 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the existence of laws, policies or guidelines to protect and promote human rights in the context of AI.

Government frameworks

31st

/

138

Australia got a score of 34.69 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the existence of laws, policies or guidelines to protect and promote human rights in the context of AI.

Government frameworks

31st

/

138

Australia got a score of 34.69 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the existence of laws, policies or guidelines to protect and promote human rights in the context of AI.

Government actions

Government actions

9th

/

138

Australia got a score of 72.44 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the government initiatives to implement frameworks and protect and promote rights in the context of AI.

Government actions

9th

/

138

Australia got a score of 72.44 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the government initiatives to implement frameworks and protect and promote rights in the context of AI.

Government actions

9th

/

138

Australia got a score of 72.44 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the government initiatives to implement frameworks and protect and promote rights in the context of AI.

Non-state actors

Non-state actors

7th

/

138

Australia got a score of 66.82 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the activity of private sector, academia and civil society organizations towards responsible AI.

Non-state actors

7th

/

138

Australia got a score of 66.82 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the activity of private sector, academia and civil society organizations towards responsible AI.

Non-state actors

7th

/

138

Australia got a score of 66.82 out of 100.

This pillar assesses the activity of private sector, academia and civil society organizations towards responsible AI.

To assign a final score to each country in every thematic area, the primary data collected by the country researcher in each pillar is supplemented by secondary indicators, which act as coefficients, multiplying the primary data score. Australia received a score of 0.96 for the Government Frameworks coefficient, ranking 5th, a score of 0.96 for the Government Actions coefficient, ranking 9th, and a score of 0.98 for the Non-State Actors coefficient, ranking 9th.

To assign a final score to each country in every thematic area, the primary data collected by the country researcher in each pillar is supplemented by secondary indicators, which act as coefficients, multiplying the primary data score. Australia received a score of 0.96 for the Government Frameworks coefficient, ranking 5th, a score of 0.96 for the Government Actions coefficient, ranking 9th, and a score of 0.98 for the Non-State Actors coefficient, ranking 9th.

Use client
Use client
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE

Evidence Explorer

Discover and compare all all the evidence collected for this country:

Discover the evidence collected and assessed for Australia:

Use client

We welcome any feedback on the insights and data provided by the Index for Australia. Feel free to reach out girai[at]globalcenter.ai